Wordsworth and Coleridge: Emotion, Imagination and Complexity
Wordsworth and Coleridge both had strong, and sometimes conflicting, . of class in his poems, and could also discuss the connection between form and. Adam Sisman describes the exhilarating rise of a relationship the two poets Coleridge Was Wordsworth's Albatross . sole copyright, even though five poems, including “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” were Coleridge's. They produced a collection of poems, The Lyrical Ballads, which proved Wordsworth is interested in the relationship between man and nature and in the.
Thus, after their friendship would never be the same, and although Wordsworth and Coleridge had once been compatible, and are often paired together as Romantic poets, it was ultimately their distinguishable differences that led to their falling out. His lines directly address the despair of the situation with very concise language, leaving little to the imagination. This criticism proves that Wordsworth and Coleridge were not completely compatible, and it points out how Coleridge developed his own independent poetic diction, regardless of whether or not Wordsworth approved.
Wordsworth went on to complement the passion in the poem, but his prior criticism made it clear that he would have taken a different approach to writing this poem.
In the views of Coleridge, it is imagination that is vital to poetry, and imagination is also central to his poetic style. He believed that high quality poetry is the result of imagination being involved in the process. The imagination is broken into two sectors, according to Coleridge, the primary imagination and the secondary imagination.
The liquid opium, known laudanum, was a double edge sword for Coleridge; it was the source of his tragic addiction and the potion that enthused his imagination. This was because the drug increases blood flow to certain parts of the brain, inducing a creative nature and often causing hallucinations. This is an explanation as to why Coleridge concentrated on the power of the imagination. Furthermore, the primary and secondary imagination is a concept that was unique to Coleridge, and although Wordsworth incorporated imagination into his poetry, he primarily called upon other sources of inspiration.
In addition, he allows nature to influence the mood of his poetry in works such asTintern Abbey. However, apart from differences in their poetic diction and the ways in which they derived poetic inspiration, the two poets also had different outlooks on religion. Especially in his later years, Coleridge concerned himself a great deal with God, religion and faith.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge in Contrast to William Wordsworth | InfoRefuge
Coleridge not only examined the Bible, but he also studied the Trinitarian view of Christianity along with the works of St. On the contrary, Wordsworth was an Anglican, as well as a pantheist. Although he did focus on God through nature as a pantheist, Wordsworth differed from Coleridge in that he did emphasize religious symbolism.
The stress Coleridge placed on religion and God is ironic because this poem intended to address the strain on his relationship with Wordsworth. This poem addressed God and referenced religious anecdotes i.
One would imagine that if Coleridge were addressing the problematic relationship he would use language that is partial to Wordsworth, and refrain from involving ideology different from that of Wordsworth.
On a very deep level, this may be an attempt by Coleridge to use juxtaposed concepts to convey his point. However, it is important to note that Coleridge integrated God into this poem.
It displayed that even though he was concerned about his relations with Wordsworth, a very worthwhile topic, he felt that he could best address the situation by incorporating religious references.
Wordsworth refrained from bringing God into the issue, but instead used a literary device to convey his sentiment.
When Coleridge met Wordsworth
Wordsworth comments on the situation from a simple standpoint and does not involve God or a higher being; however, Coleridge makes the situation more intricate by involving God. On the surface, this is an example of Coleridge complicating things that Wordsworth deemed simple.
However, to truly understand why Coleridge involved God in his poem and why Wordsworth did not, one must understand how they each individually interpreted symbolism. In contrast, he is looked inside himself but not inside his soul, while Coleridge asserted that man must look inside himself and it is there he will find inspiration in God.
Whether their differences stemmed from religion, means of inspiration, or simply poetic diction, it is evident that these two poets were uniquely individual. Moreover, although Samuel Coleridge is often paired with William Wordsworth, upon further examination one can plainly see that the two poets are undoubtedly different.
The similarities between them often overshadow their individual achievements, ideas, and styles. Combined with the fact that his opium addiction crippled his poetic potential, these elements portray Coleridge as less accomplished poet than Wordsworth. Regardless of popular opinion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge possessed his own unique poetic diction, sought non-traditional methods of poetic inspiration, conveyed original theories about the imagination, and distinctly incorporated his religious philosophies into his poetry.
What Did William Wordsworth Do to Samuel Taylor Coleridge?
It is for these reasons that Samuel Taylor Coleridge remains a pillar for the Romantic era of poetry. Coleridge and Wordsworth; Language of Allusion. This source focuses on the relationship between Coleridge and Wordsworth, both as friends and as collaborators. Wordsworth was not only the right size, he was stable enough to anchor the 'mastless and rudderless' Coleridge.
He was also, so Coleridge believed, a good enough bard to take on the job he had until now set aside for himself: Wordsworth, who struggled to achieve this aim for the rest of his life, was flattered and the impossible terms of the friendship were set. What happened next has become the stuff of literary legend. As they wandered over the Quantock Hills, the two men conceived of the Lyrical Ballads, a collection of poems, most of which were neither ballads nor lyrical, which would radically challenge the diet of jaded and ornate verse which was dulling the palates of the English reading public.
These were poems written 'for men', as Wordsworth put it, in the language of men and their subject would be neither love nor religion but those people who were marginalised, disenfranchised and dispossessed.A Revolution in Poetry: Wordsworth and Coleridge, 1798 - James Chandler
When the Wordsworths moved to Grasmere, Coleridge followed suit, settling his family in nearby Keswick. It was from Dove Cottage that the two men planned the second edition of Lyrical Ballads and the initial euphoria of their union began to fade. In a last-minute pronouncement, Wordsworth omitted Coleridge's dreamlike Christabel from the collection, replacing it with his own poem, Michael. Whether or not Coleridge supported this decision, the balance between them had shifted.
From now on Wordsworth was in the ascendancy and Coleridge believed the poet in himself to be dead. His marriage was failing, he had writer's block, and the quantity of opium he was consuming was making him ill. He had known Wordsworth for only four years; there was a decade still to go before Coleridge would learn from a mutual friend that Wordsworth thought him 'a rotten drunkard' who had been 'an absolute nuisance in his family'.
Coleridge said that a thunderbolt burst from a blue sky on his soul. One reason why The Friendship — which could just as well be called The Break-up — is such a satisfying book is that Adam Sisman subverts the roles in which Wordsworth and Coleridge became trapped.